Football’s flow fractured?

Football has long been celebrated as a game of two halves. At the 2026 FIFA World Cup, however, it increasingly resembles a contest played in four quarters. What was introduced as a medical precaution has mutated into a tactical tool and, more overtly, a lucrative broadcasting asset.

Mandatory three-minute hydration breaks, introduced by FIFA to combat summer heat across North America, now take place around the 22nd minute of each half and have become one of the tournament’s most contentious talking points.

The latest voice to question the policy is Netherlands captain Virgil van Dijk.

Following his side's 2-2 draw with Japan at Dallas’ air-conditioned stadium on Monday (Bangladesh time), the Liverpool defender questioned the need for mandatory breaks in every match, regardless of conditions.

"I think hydration breaks are really interesting. I think for the neutral watchers on TV it is also not great. If it is really hot it would be good to put them in, but I think you have to look at it in every game separately," Van Dijk told reporters.

"I was obviously watching almost all of the games up until today. I think every time going to commercials is not really something that I like," added the Liverpool defender.

Van Dijk's concerns echo those of his former club manager Jurgen Klopp. The German master tactician had launched a far more scathing attack, accusing “executives in air-conditioned offices of holding the game hostage” while speaking to German television channel ZDF.

Stripping away the corporate side of things, US women’s national team manager Emma Hayes focused purely on the psychological impact, branding them "momentum breaks" that are only welcomed by teams chasing a game.

On a similar note, former Spain midfielder and World Cup-winner Juan Mata suggested players universally prefer matches to flow uninterrupted. "When you're losing, you want to score, and when you're winning you want to keep the ball. I think they break the momentum," Mata told ITV Sport.

Yet, the policy does not lack defenders. Spain coach Luis de la Fuente remains highly supportive of the measure, arguing that player welfare must remain paramount. "In my opinion, the best thing to do is to drink lots of water," De la Fuente said. "Take a break, let them breathe for a few seconds."

But where De la Fuente sees a rest, others see an opportunity. US coach Mauricio Pochettino turned a simple water stop into a high-tech touchline seminar during his side’s 4-1 win over Paraguay, deploying a laptop in full force to deliver instructions.

Beyond the debate, the breaks have already influenced matches.

Brazil provided perhaps the clearest example. Trailing Morocco 1-0, coach Carlo Ancelotti used a hydration break to reorganise his side and deliver fresh instructions. Within minutes of the restart, Vinicius Junior had equalised.

"You can explain a problem to the players," Ancelotti said afterwards. "You can make a tactical adjustment that can be very good."

Canada also equalised shortly after a second-half cooling break against Bosnia and Herzegovina, while Scotland and Australia both scored decisive goals soon after play resumed in their opening matches.

Others have found themselves on the wrong side of the interruptions. Debutants Curacao matched Germany before such a break in the first half, only to concede three more soon after and eventually losing 7-1. Czechia lost momentum against South Korea following a stoppage, while the Netherlands surrendered a lead against Japan after the second-half hydration break.

Whether viewed as hydration breaks, cooling breaks or, as Hayes calls them, momentum breaks, the traditional, uninterrupted flow of World Cup football is facing a profound existential threat.

And it is no longer just the water bottles causing the friction. The expanding use of lengthy Video Assistant Referee (VAR) reviews, often stretching several minutes at key match-defining moments, has added another heavy layer of interruption.

Will this compounding slowdown change the sport for good, or for the better?

Click here to read article